Is the Era of Isolationism in this Country over?

A quick game of Who-am-I?

I was one of the greatest presidents of the United States.  Yet I did not invade any other country during my presidency.  Instead, I focused my foreign policy on peace building and human rights.  Who am I?

I almost wish Newt Gingrich, Darrell Issa, and Grover Norquist read my blog, because I’m about to punch them all in the face.  No you stupid Reagan worshipers:

It’s Jimmy Carter.

Jimmy Carter never dropped a bomb.  That’s only one of the great things he did as president.  Where we’d be if Jimmy Carter had won a second term keeps me up at night.  Let me tell you this-I doubt we’d be in this mess.

Jimmy Carter was our last isolationist president.  When Obama and/or the GOP Congress are letting me down, it often feels like he was the last true liberal to occupy the White House.

It often feels like isolationism is loosing momentum.  1981 was over thirty years ago.  Ever since then, this country has barely had a minute where we were not involved in some sort of overseas conflict.  Reagan secretly sold weapons to Iran while publicly supporting Iraq in the Iran-Iraq War.  His vice president flipped the position when he was president and took us into Iraq.  Although Clinton deployed troops and dropped several bombs, we never had a real war on our hands.

The W. came along and soon after that 9/11(thank-you, Ronnie) and we plunged into Afghanistan.  Then came Iraq, much like Syria now: except with a more hawkish administration.  We all know how those turned out.

None of this is like what James Monroe outlined for US Foreign Policy in the Monroe Doctrine:

The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of the liberty and happiness of their fellow-men on that side of the Atlantic. In the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparation for our defense. With the movements in this hemisphere we are of necessity more immediately connected, and by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. The political system of the allied powers is essentially different in this respect from that of America. This difference proceeds from that which exists in their respective Governments; and to the defense of our own, which has been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and matured by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, and under which we have enjoyed unexampled felicity, this whole nation is devoted. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere. But with the Governments who have declared their independence and maintain it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European power in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.

Indeed, while Carter’s policy of “strict neutrality in conflict” would have seemed like a radical statement for Obama to make in his campaigns, it was in fact the blueprint US Foreign policy for almost a century.

I suppose I’m expected to use this post to endorse Rand Paul, who wants to take this country back to the isolationist level.  A Paul presidency, while being in support of American isolationism, would probably ignore women’s health, the Voting Rights Act, and a lot of other principles that are important to this country.

No.  On this issue I’m endorsing a second term for Jimmy Carter.

 

 

 

 

 

Top Seven Reasons why we Need to Stay out of Syria

I’m no foreign policy expert, but I have a duty; as America is on the brink of WAR.  Be sure to contact Obama regarding this issue:

• 7: It’s religious: The war in Syria is as much religious as it is political. Shiites are fighting mostly with Assad; and the country’s Sunni majority is fighting with the Opposition.  The government should not be involved in such a display of religious affiliation; in fact it is somewhat unconstitutional.
• 6: No one in America likes it: Only eleven percent of the public supports intervention.  Should we really be sending Americans to die  and spending all this money for a war only eleven percent of the public supports?  No.
• It Would Further Strain our Relationship with Russia: It already has been straining our relationship with Russia, in addition to Snowden’s escape to the airport terminal.  Let’s not make Putin angry, okay?
• 4: It’s the Sequester, Baby.  Due to the federal budget deficit, we’ve had to cut spending on lots of different programs that could have helped many Americans.  Although the war would create jobs, it would strain our coffers and drag us deeper into debt.    Obama’s not been spending much, but with a war; all of that will change.  Why should we destroy things overseas when we could be rebuilding bridges and solving other problems here at home?
• 3: We did this ten years ago in Iraq.  Look what happened: Seriously.  The only thing that’s motivating Obama is faulty intelligence, which motivated Bush in Iraq.  Except, for reason number two, this time, it’s a lot worse.   A New York Times article said that a conflict in Syria will last us a really long time.  Do we really want to invest all this time?
• 2: We’ll be helping Al Qaeda: Obama has been warning us about this.  However, he’s not heeding his own warning.  Prominent members of the Syrian opposition are members of Al Qaeda.  Ronald Reagan aided Al Qaeda members in the 80’s.  Look what they did to our buildings less than twenty years later.  This will be bring us full circle; maybe to another 9/11 and Afghanistan.  It will also bring us to reason 1:
• 1: American Imperialism has failed for over a century.  Stop trying it.   They say the dumbest people are the ones who trying something again when it doesn’t work.  This has been America’s foreign policy for over a century now.  Our imperialism led to WWI, which in turn led to the Holocaust and WWII, which in turn led to the Cold War.  The Cold War led to our relationship with North Korea.  Whenever America chooses war and violence, in the end we fail miserably.   Probably the greatest thing  for American foreign policy was when JFK peacefully ended the Cuban Missile Crisis.  Because peace won over war then, we avoided a possible nuclear holocaust; and all the other effects of a war with the USSR.  I can’t wait for the day when this country’s leaders decide that wasting government money on “democracy” in the Middle East is the biggest waste of government money, as well as human capital, in this era.